Back when “the Internet” was Usenet and FTP sites, back when I was a newlywed holed up in an 800 sq. foot apartment off Briley Parkway, I spent my time downloading LOTR illustrations (one favourite took 10 minutes via Fetch) and bantering on alt.folklore.urban. That’s how I encountered the people who would become “Snopes”. We were all just nerds arguing about glass flow and $250 cookie recipes. It was like that for years, until HTML came along and The Internet as we know it began to happen in earnest.
The Snopes folks took what the alt.folklore.urban newsgroup did (debunking rumours) and put it on one o’ them fancy yooarells. All of us now had a way to prove wrong all those annoying chain emails our crazy Aunt Phyllis sent out.
–No, nobody had spiders hatch in their stomach after swallowing Bubble Yum.
–Yes, that is a Penis on the Little Mermaid VHS box.
And of course we used the “citations, please” method to debunk political emails. Back in 2000 I used Snopes’ research to counter several anti-Bush memes. Like the one where people were saying he refused to sell his home to black people.
Then came 2008 and Obama looked like a threat to the current structure. All of a sudden all the same rumour mills that had churned against Bush began to churn against Obama. I know you’ve gotten the emails. The ones that document the 50 lies told by Obama. That sort of thing.
Snopes did what Snopes does best. They researched the rumours, looking at original sources and documenting their findings. All of a sudden those get-your-blood-boiling tales that were making the rounds met the worst opposition a rumour has…the truth. But here’s the tricky part:
The rumour mill started saying that Snopes was funded by George Soros, working undercover for Obama. (Note the complete absence of “Snopes Is Funded by The Right, Working for Bush” in 2000-2007, even though they were oftentimes the best Internet friend George Bush ever had.)
I didn’t know about this lie until yesterday. I’ve often used Snopes to back me up, because I can point to their research when I get sappy stories about dead soldiers’ dogs that I know in my gut are fictional. People can’t trust my gut, but they can trust honest research. But then I got a bunch of flak and one person said she would trust me, but not trust Snopes. I honestly wondered WHY. Then I looked it up and found all this mess.
Here’s the thing. The only people I’ve heard saying that Snopes is founded by Soros are Christians. That’s purely because the only conservatives I know are also Christians; it’s correlation, not causation. But even the woman who told me that she “heard a rumour but I trust the source of the rumour” admitted she had no facts and hadn’t researched it. She just was happy as a clam to believe something negative about someobody else because they told the truth about a political adversary.
People, this is why I hate the Culture War. Because you have Christians who are happy to believe others who bear false witness. I do credit the woman who clued me in to the story for not spreading the rumour herself. I give her that. But even being willing to believe the worst about someone–when the answers are so readily obtainable is contrary to the principles of Grace.
This is what the low form of politics we call the “Culture War” has done. It shovels manure. It bears false witness. It puts another god before God. It corrupts the Sabbath day with vile talk about political enemies in the hallways of church. It teaches us to covet power.
I’m just way too disgusted to come up with a sound conclusion to this.
It’s why I only half-heartedly bother debunking this kind of stuff now. People believe what they choose to (everyone to some degree, some more than others) and that’s that.
I have a suggestion: “Christians, do not bear false witness.” And B, “Conservatives, same thing.”*
* I say this as both a Christian and a Conservative. Demonizing one’s opponents is bad. Making sh!t up to demonize one’s opponent is evil.
I thought I’d remembered hearing the Snopes/Soros thing even before Obama came along. At least I’m sure I remember hearing about how lefty and biased Snopes was. As for the lack of voices from the left saying the reverse thing, I would love to say that we lefties are more amenable to facts and reason but I don’t think that’s the explanation. I think it’s that we saw Bush as an individual bad actor — representative of a certain viewpoint, sure; effectively promoting the interests of certain groups, sure; but not part of a conspiracy. While my impression is that many on the right see Obama’s election as prima facie evidence of conspiracy. And if you don’t believe in conspiracies, you may look at facts that disprove some of your assumptions and accept them. But if you do believe in conspiracies, then clearly anyone presenting such facts are part of the coverup at least. (I do know some “9/11 truthers” who won’t believe any of the evidence debunking their lunacy.)
It’s also why we need to teach basic internet literacy and critical thinking and research skills to kids. Being a supposed “digital native” age-wise is apparently no protection against believing dumb things.
I don’t believe anything anymore without fact-checking back to as original a source as possible.
This is how I destroyed my life-long, paralyzing fear of Dec. 21, 2012. I checked out every link until I got the the origin. Found the truth; now I can live a life again.
But most won’t go through the trouble. They are lazy or simply searching for any straw that will qualify their own ideology anyway. I’ve had to change my opinions several times in my life.
The Apr. 2nd Supreme Court decision enabling police to pretty much do anything they want anymore without fear of public complaint is a case in point.
No way could I believe our current President would allow it. So imagine my dismay and somewhat surprise when I read from the Drudge report (albeit, nowhere else) that our President actually told Eric Holder to let Roberts know that he pretty much approved of the verdict before it was handed down!
Turns out it was something of a gift to the mayors of towns and cities where Occupy was a major force. I guess they figured the populace would become much more compliant if they realized that protesting could result in being, not just jailed, but strip- and cavity searched in such a humiliating way. I still consider this state-sanctioned RAPE.
So to those who would tell you the President is a Commie, I have to say Oh Please – he’s just as much a fascist, if not more than previous administrations, possibly save Woodrow Wilson’s , when he turned the White House guns on protesting WWI vets who only wanted a fair shake.
Everyone’s got a skeleton. I guess it’s a case of whose bones you’d prefer. Facts no longer seem to matter.
Isn’t this new Internet age wonderful? Not only can we have our own opinions, now we can have our own facts! Sigh.
Snopes is run by partisan leftists. That’s actually a FACT, not a rumor. You can trust them (even though they’re not professional investigators or anything of the sort) or distrust them, but to whine “Why didn’t people call them right-wingers during the Bush years?!?!?!” is disingenuous at best.