Original Text of Demand Letter Pg 1
Original Text of Demand Letter Pg 2
[Original on Letterhead from King & Ballow Law Offices]
CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ms. Katherine Coble
ADDRESS BLACKOUT
Hermitage, Tennessee 37076
Re: Your Blog: “Just Another Pretty Farce”
February 27, 2007 posting regarding JL Kirk Associates (R)
Dear Ms. Coble:
This firm represents JL Kirk Associates. In the February 27, 2007, posting to your blog “Just Another Pretty Farce” you made the following false and defamatory statements about JL Kirk Associates:
- JL Kirk Associates “…was formerly Bernald Haldane before it was purchased by Mr. Kirk Leipzig.”
- That JL Kirk Associates personnel “use fear to motivate” potential clients to pay for services “without question and without the possibility of a refund.”
- That, during your interview with your husband, there were questions “designed to help [you] as the insecure wife put more economic pressure” on your husband.
- That the amount you were asked to pay “neatly” coincided with your tax refund “which is a matter of public record.”
In addition, a number of statements made in you posting conve a meaning that is clearly injurious to the reputation of JL Kirk Associates.
Under Tennessee law, any malicious publication expressed in writing intending to injure the character or diminish the reputation of a business is libel. Moreover, even if statements are literally true, the publisher of those statements is subject to monetary damages where “the meaning reasonably conveyed by the published words is defamatory.” Memphis Publishing Comany v. Nichols, 569 S.W. 2d 412 (Tenn. 1978)
[Page 2]
As the “publisher” of your blog, you control, and are responsible for, the content appearing in it. References by persons posting to your blog to JL Kirk Associates as “crooks” and its services as a “scam” are equally false and defamatory as your own.
In addition to your liability for defamation, under Tennessee law, the defamatory statements made in your blog are, by your own admission, intended to “discourage anyone who stumbles across this entry from even going through the JL Kirk & (sic) Associates ‘interview process’.” As such, you may be subject to liability for monetary damages for tortuous interference with the business relationships of JL Kirk Associates. See Trau-Med of America, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Company et al, 71 S. W. 3d 691, 701 (Tenn. 2002).
We hereby demand that you take down the blog entry regarding JL Kirk Associates together with the entire thread of comments. We further demand that you cease and desist from any fruther attempts to injure and interfere with the business of JL Kirk Associates. It is regrettable that you decided not to engage the services of JL Kirk Associates. That, however, does not entitle you to publish defamatory statements in an attempt to interfere with its business. If you do not comply with these demands on or before April 13, 2007, JL Kirk Associates intends to sue you for damages. Please direct any communications regarding this matter to the udnersigned.
Respectfully,
[Signature]
Alan E. Korpady
cc: Mr. Kirk Leipzig
UPDATE 4/17/06: Attorneys for JL Kirk & Assocs. contacted Media Bloggers Association attorney Ronald Coleman shortly after receiving his letter stating that the MBA was representing me in this dispute on Thursday afternoon. Both sides expressed their wish to avoid litigation or further aggravation of the situation. JL Kirk’s main concern at the outset was that we communicate their position – which is different from the information originally told to me by a JL Kirk employee – that JL Kirk is not a continuation of the defunct Bernard Haldane company, either in terms of corporate identity or stock ownership, and that JL Kirk’s principal, Kirk Leipzig, is only a former Bernard Haldane employee but did not buy any assets or stock of Bernard Haldane. I can’t vouch for the truth of that statement because I have no first-hand knowledge of the facts, but evidently anyone who wants more information can obtain it from JL Kirk.
As you know if you read their cease and desist letter, the company disagrees with what I have said about them here, but they have told the MBA lawyer that they are interested in discussing this with my husband and me personally rather than litigating in court. I have not decided if I am interested in talking, but I don’t mind the idea of putting this behind me and moving on, and will not write on this topic again.
[…] It was delivery of a certified letter. […]
Did they really write “tortuous interference”? I like that.
I know you logged the IP of Quilt Lady. Since she represented herself as an employee and said what’s-his-name had bought the franchise assets, there’s your defense to No. 1. No. 2 is your considered opinion. No. 3 is malarkey because it’s also your considered opinion. And No. 4 can also be backed up with fact, so hey ya, truth as a defense.
Pbbbblt.
P.S. — “Pbbbblt” is *my* considered opinion. Of them.
Searched google for Mr. Leipzig, apparently there are more dangerous and “tortuous interference” reports out there other than yours:
http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/ripoff31551.htm
http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/ripoff148408.htm
Those are the top two listings in the search.
Just wondering why its ok for those posts to be up…but yours shouldn’t be…
Further reading…apparently those were during the time before the name was changed from Bernard Haladane.
Go get em Kat. Go get em.
[…] April 11th 2007, 8:46 pm Filed under: Kat Coble, JL Kirk, lawsuit, Nashville Bring it on guys. If you try and sue one blogger for it. You better be ready to sue them all. No Comments so far Leave a comment RSS feed for […]
Sink their ship, Kat. God forbid anyone be able to hold an opinion of a person or organization, particularly a classy one like this.
(I like “torturous interference”, too. That’s fun language.)
Alan E. Korpady (not Kormady) is the associate whose name is on the letter. Of course, his bio on the law office web site say that he graduated from Rippon College…That’s probably ‘Ripon College’. So, spelling isn’t an issue in this case.
[…] now they are threatening her if she doesn’t take it down. Let’s keep in mind that the employment agent in question […]
Did they really write “tortuous interference”? I like that.
Yes, nm, they did. It made me smile a little bit.
Will, I’m not surprised there were typos. I had some rage-fingers going.
I’ve attached the scan to show the original.
I hate bullies.
Hopefully, my friend at Channel 4 can pass this along to the investigative unit. If they are not yet working on the story, this might push them over the edge.
Kat, I am so proud of you right now. That is all.
Kat, I know this is probably hard, but you have my support and my respect.
It’s not much, but it’s yours.
Your honor, not only did she defame us, she led us around in little circles while doing so! And now we feel insulted and dizzy.
I know it’s not a joke. But sometimes you gotta laugh.
I think they are going to have a hard time proving that you caused enough monetary damages from your post to cover the cost of them taking you to court over the statements. It sounds like an empty threat to prompt you to remove the content, but you should seek legal council just to be sure.
In any case, since you brought this to our attention, I think the rest of the blogosphere can simply “report” on your story with more detrimental results while allowing you to remove the content and avoid any legal repercussions.
I just noticed this:
“even if statements are literally true, the publisher of those statements is subject to monetary damages where “the meaning reasonably conveyed by the published words is defamatory.”
What the hell? This is the law of the land in TN? How screwed up is THAT?
Besides, I’ve paid very close attention; your writing on this and other matters is extremely dry (no offense) and factual . I notice because I’m so wildly emotional and go off half-cocked most of the time, and the contast between us fascinates me. You have been extremely careful in each and every word you’ve written.
It would take an incredible lawyer to infer defamation from your very plain and simply descriptive sentences.
I just get madder and madder about this with each passing minute.
let us know if there’s anything your local bloggosphere can do in support. especially if it’s… devious. it’s dangerous to threaten bloggers these days, they say.
DOWN WITH THE MAN! and all that jazz.
It’s not nice to hit people in the face that wear glasses.
What a waste of precious time…
And, how do they prove “damage”?
“even if statements are literally true, the publisher of those statements is subject to monetary damages where “the meaning reasonably conveyed by the published words is defamatory.”
THIS is the lawof the land in the state of TN?
What the Hell?
Was this pushed through by Scientologists and the RIAA?
This makes me madder and madder.
I would have thought Remnant Church would have sued you first. 🙂
This is an extortion scam, relying on its object’s healthy fear of incurring vast legal fees in self-defense. Surely there are foundations (FIRE in academic matters comes to mind) willing to litigate these rancid dolts into the ground… just recently, a California blog posted legal correspondence to unbelievably hubristic RIAA attorneys, refuting every phony citation and pointing out –as if they didn’t know– that threatening action against defendents “failure to respond” (i.e. to remit a $3900 “damage claim”) was in itself a violation not only of California statutes but of standard legal ethics (sic).
The RIAA tort-choppers dropped dead, and may yet face action to redress their scandalous arrogance, which of course assumed that, a) Their targets were ignorant of all procedures and provisions, and b) That so-called “defendants” would fear accumulating costs to fend off extortionate assault.
If possible, we urge fighting this egregious harassment by every possible means. In so doing, one acts on behalf of every web-based site or commenter. Once let these invariably crooked blowhards chill expression, armies of duplicitous legalites will circle like piranhas to tear off fees in chunks.
The lawsuit strategy represented by the letter, as well as the tone of the letter, tends to support the allegations of which they complain, don’t they? At least, that’s my opinion.
Send a certified letter back saying:
To whom it may be concerned:
Suck it.
Sincerely,
Katherine Coble
Oh…and I guess I’d better start cranking out the “Free Katherine Coble” bumper stickers. 🙂
I’ve been sick all day, but I just wanted you to know, I’m in your corner, Kat. Give ’em hell!
I like John Blake’s view on this.
There’s a growing problem with US law called “legal abuse syndrome” (Google it) — dealing with law can produce traumatic stress as its pressure and intimidation knows few bounds.
When possible, try and keep out of this tar to avoid being pitched by it, Kate.
Shoot me an e-mail if you’d like me to talk to your husband. I’m a former recruiter with a recruiting blog, and I’d be happy to share some industry advice on how to do your own recruiting, and how to work with reputable recruiters. I’ve also posted this on my site and submitted it to a recruiting Digg-like community.
IANAL. In plain english this, “even if statements are literally true, the publisher of those statements is subject to monetary damages where “the meaning reasonably conveyed by the published words is defamatory.” means…
If the statements are literally true yet give a reasonably conveyed meaning that is not true… it can still be libel.
Sort of like the quoted statement, while literally true, gives the reasonably conveyed meaning that libel is defined by the result that people think badly of the person or firm you spoke the truth about.
That truth is not a defense.
When, logically and almost certainly, it is the part of the law that addresses the ability to be deceitful while covering your *ss by not actually uttering any words that aren’t true… exactly like the lawyers seem to have done in the letter. They take an actual quote for the purpose of intimidating you by implying that it applies to your case.
Add that law firm to the list of people who one good citizens should never do business with.
Get a lawyer to write a response as regards the employees revealing of confidential financial and other information in the comment of your other post. You may have a counterclaim of some type.
Huh. This is big.
(Sorry I don’t have anything more meaningful than that to say).
Incidentally, I used to get daily hits from that law firm. I have no idea who it was working there that used to read (and still occasionally reads) my LiveJournal. Maybe they’re reading every blog in Nashville trying to find some business. Perhaps an updated version of the ambulance-chaser? Blog-chaser?
The above statement is by no means intended to portray the law firm of King and Ballow as blog-chasing opportunists.
Oh, look, another cease and desist letter. Yawns…
Kat –
Funny that King & Ballow’s esteemed attorneys thought it necessary to include the case citations regarding tortuous interference but somehow missed the caselaw on 1st Amendment protections, opinions as free speech, truth as the ultimate defense, etc.
If you need any help on this, Kat, give me a holler.
I have a very low tolerance for bullies…
Cheers,
Rob
I would not worry a whole lot about the legal skills of any attorney who can’t spell “tortious.”
Of course, this comment will probably trigger another demand letter requiring you to stop injuring the attorney’s professional reputation by advertising his incompetence, since, after all, in his world, truth is not a defense to libel . . .
This is nonsense. “Truth is an absolute defense” and they know it.
(http://www.expertlaw.com/library/personal_injury/defamation.html)
What do you call 1000 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean?
If you decide to take it down, let me know so I can post it on my blog. Let ’em try and screw with me. I like Blake’s letter, however I would ammend it by simply making a photocopy of my middle finger and Fed Ex it. If you need help, I’ll bet The Jeffrey would surely LOVE to rip these guys apart. Let me know.
please sing this together to the tune of Jingle Bells:
“Oh what fun, it is to sue, with Jesus by my side!”
Oh yeah, I forgot. Stupid is as stupid does. Stupid. Yup, now I’m pissed.
[…] something she wrote that offended one of the law firm's clients. King & Ballow sent Coble a "demand letter" demanding she take down a post she published. K&B and the client – the headhunter firm JL Kirk […]
Welcome to the really big time. You’re on Fark. Congratulations.
If you’ve got the guts for it, it should be VERRRY interesting to see if there’s ever any follow-up to this letter. There’s a somewhat similar case going on in New York between a former Playmate and a blogger that seems to be resolving itself with the Playmate coming to terms with the fact that she’s batshait crazy.
Unfortunately, you’re not dealing with crazy; you’ve got someone with questionable ethics (at best). I have a feeling that a good attorney will get the court to laugh this out. Good luck.
I’m not giving you legal advice by no means, but having seen probably about 20 cease & desist letters sent to different bloggers, it’s been my experience that it’s just empty intimidation.
They didn’t get any money out of you as a client, if they legitimately thought they had a case against you, you wouldn’t be getting a C&D, you’d be getting a lawsuit already. If you look at the “false and defamatory” statements they list, all but the first one is clearly a subjective opinion (I’d love to see them prove to a judge that that wasn’t your opinion), and the one that wasn’t an opinion is factual so far as all outside sources you linked to say.
If they actually sue you, I some how suspect the donations that will pour in from the blogosphere will more than cover the legal fees it would require for you to successfully defend against their “case” in court.
[…] until Heather’s post yesterday on the plight of Katherine Coble, the target of outright intimidation by Kirk’s lawyers because of a few posts she made on her blog about her experience with them […]
[…] endures some crappy service in a business. They write about it on their blog, and BOOM, they get a cease and desist order from a law […]
Kat,
I had the same experience with this outfit six years ago in Indy. I could not believe they wanted me to give them what amounted to every dollar I had at the time for them to maybe find me a job. I was stunned. These guys are scum running a scam IMAO.
Noah.
Can’t find your email addy on here.
Fsck em. We have WordPress, I’ll host your site for free. I’ll even get you a domain for a year. Email me.
[…] the time I was able to get back to my computer, I decided nothing I could say on this matter would be as eloquent as everything I read elsewhere. In fact, this happened so fast that I by the […]
[…] language</OPPORTUNITY PASSED>4. Blogger is taken aback, and posts about the letter (maybe even adds in a scanned copy of it!)5. Bloggers small circle of online friends and readers react angrily, and post about it themselves6. […]
This happened to us in Texas (under the name Bernard Haldane) about 3-4 years ago. I also found info on them at ripoffreport.com. This was about a page and a half in on a google search. We’d already paid them (completely stupid, I know). My husband already had a job, but was looking for something else. I had commented on ripoffreport.com and then we went after them to get our money back and they made both of us sign an agreement to not say anything about them any more in order to get our money back, which we did get back. They are absolute crooks and what they are clearly committing is fraud! I cannot for the life of me understand how they are still in business at all! I’m sorry more people are having to go through this. Don’t be scared of them. You fight and you can win. Just the publicity from this could put an end to them!
Good Luck.
jb
[…] Company, suffering badly from cranio-rectal inversion, decide to send threatening cease and desist letter in hopes that blogger will get skeered and comply… […]
J.L. Kirk Lawyer Sends Katherine Coble C
Now, this really got my attention. How in the world could a company sue a person over posting their opinion? It happened here.
After reading the cease and desist letter, I have to wonder if it is in fact written by an attorney. …sounds more like a wannabe…perhaps somone who didn’t pass the bar or is in law school.
You really need to fight fire with fire, but of course they know your husband is unemployed and that you likely don’t have the resources to hire an attoney….they are counting on this.
The letter is designed to scare you.
Who knows, perhaps all the exposure over this issue will lead you and your husband to a contact that will result in a job.
I am looking for a new job, thanks for this warning.
Can you imagine if movie directors, producers, actors, and whatnot sued people for bad movie reviews? What about bad T.V. reviews? Restaurant reviews? Product reviews?
I think we have a right to share our opinions of goods and services with anyone else who might use them, without getting sued. The company has a right to respond, but a lawsuit goes just a bit too far.
Keep up the good fight, Kat.
This sounds *exactly* like most (it seems) lawyers here in TN.
My mom and dad got divorced after almost 40 years together and of course she should have got alimony. He fought it in court, but lost, and him being a retired doctor has the money to keep trying to fight it. Mom gets ~$700 social security per month. She hired a lawyer to get the courts to force dad to pay the damn alimony. Her lawyer was so worthless, that on one court date the SoB didn’t even show up!
I was extremely close to just going there to his office and blacking both his eyes. Nothing but scumbags, and they seem to be proud of it.
I hope you nail the bastards Miss Kat!
Super lame. This is why I hate those awful agencies.
Good luck proving malicious intent…imbeciles- in my opinion…lol.
Have you contacted http://www.chillingeffects.org/ yet? They’ve got a whole other audience that’ll get reached.
Is a New War Starting?
I may be wearing the foil hat a bit too tight right about now, but earlier today, I just had this eerie feeling that a war over the right to free speech was about to erupt. First we have The Enlightened and Exalted Eminent Emancipator and Supreme Benev…
The disciplinary people at your state bar association would know if, as is increasingly common, it is a violation of legal ethics to present a fake argument in a civil case. This might be worth pursuing.
The ABA mentions Memphis Publishing Company v. Nichols here, and while I am not a lawyer or other legal professional nor have I read the original opinion, it doesn’t sound very germane.
It appears that in that case, it was the omission of information that was judged defamatory; in particular,
Unless you have concealed some material fact that would change the context sufficiently as to make these folks look good, I don’t see how this would apply.
Another aspect of the Nichols case referred to in citations of it is the public person/private person distinction; a public person must prove actual malice, a harder standard to meet, and I suspect that a company that publicly advertises its services would be more likely to fall on that side of the line.
Oh, and one other citation of Nichols that should be of interest: “Damages from false or inaccurate statements cannot be presumed; actual damage must be sustained and proved.”
If I were going to “return fire” I might also find Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps of interest, since the US Supreme Court held in that case that “In a case such as this one, where a newspaper publishes speech of public concern about a private figure, the private-figure plaintiff cannot recover damages without also showing that the statements at issue are false. Because in such a case the scales are in an uncertain balance as to whether the statements are true or false, the Constitution requires that the scales be tipped in favor of protecting true speech.”
[…] Nashville area blogger, Kat Coble, with whom I’ve enjoyed a number of very profitable conversations with, posted about her and her husband’s experience with a headhunting firm called JL Kirk and Associates. Kat claimed that the experience felt like a shakedown, and that they were asked to pay up front an amount of money that was suspiciously close to the tax return money they had just received from the Federal Government. Well, long story short, Kat got served… literally. […]
[…] you’re unfamiliar with the Coble/Kirk story: Background and […]
Why isn’t Mr. Korpady listed on the Tenn Bar website?
http://www.tba2.org/alt_data/membersearch.php
R —
Possibly because he’s not a member of the Tennessee Bar Association. That’s a voluntary organization. A lot of lawyers aren’t members, including myself.
oh wow…I totally missed what you named those pdf files until just now. caught them in my address bar and went, what’s that?? had to come back and check…hahahaha.
Actually, Amy, my husband gave those files that name. I would not have done so.
🙂 still, I’m surprised no one caught it (at least that I saw)!
Roger,
You are an elitist! Join the TBA!! The TBA needs you! The TBA wants you!
Why, oh why America, will Roger not join the TBA!?!
A true conservative would join the TBA, Roger.
[…] this week Coble received a demand letter from big Nashville firm King & Ballow, insisting that she take down the blog post. As I have […]
Amy, they probably did but thought it was my stupid sense of “humour”.
Normally it would be, but I have lost most of my laughs over this farkakte business.
oh, Kat…please don’t lose your laughs over this…that would be a big loss for all of us!
Keep pressing on Katherine. You are certainly not alone in your experiences. In 2005, I was contacted by JL Kirk after posting a resume on various job boards. Like other posters, I was lead to believe I was being called to an interview for a management position. That initial meeting lead to intense high-pressure tactics filled with misleading statements and lack of information. Twice, I turned down the deal only to be hounded by telephone until I was convinced these folks were legit. After several weeks (and reminders that I had already lost over $10K in income because of my delay), I agreed to sign the agreement and payed out $4200 (which did not match my income tax refund).
What followed was a serious of make-shift “training” exercises, rushed counselor meetings, constant shifting from one counselor to another (I had at least 4 within 3 months). What never happened was even one contact, one interview, one lead. The hard-sell “we network for you” proved to be only a serious of disconnects. In the meantime, I secured a position totally on my own…one in an industry that was foreign to me, has not proved enjoyable, and pays a fraction of my career history. Numerous complaints were filed with VP Rich Leipzig by phone and office meetings, but there was never delivery of what they contracted to do…provide leads and contacts, not land a job. I knew that was my job.
Several months ago, I was contacted anonymously by someone who must have been a JL Kirk employee. The email came from an unidentified source and solicited my participation in a complaint being filed with the Attorney General’s office. Because I could not validate the source of the contact, I chose not to participate.
While I don’t know the history of this company, I do know from personal experience that their tactics are deceptive and misleading, generally taking advantage of vulnerable unemployed or underemployed professionals who make the mistake of trusting. When one has no income and invests thousands of dollars in seeking help, only to get no help…there is, at minimum, a serious lack of integrity.
Katherine,
According to a story that the Seattle Times published on September 22, 2002, Kirk Leipzig did purchase the Seattle-area offices of Bernard Haldane. So, you didn’t necessarily make a false statement by tying Kirk Leipzig to Bernard Haldane.
To locate that Seattle Times story, go to the archive section of the newspaper’s website, and then search for the story titled “Watching out for pricey career advice”.
[…] Kirk sent Katherine Coble an official “cease and desist” letter threatening legal action if she didn’t remove her post about the company and all related […]
“desist from any fruther attempts”
Any written agreement to settle this matter should stipulate that spelling is of the essence.
hey Korpady – BLOW IT OUT YOUR…WHAT?
Gotta love it – maybe 35 years ago I was having trouble with a neighbor while I was in Grad School. She hired a laywer and had him send me a letter about being a “private nuisance”. Anyway – I called himd and told hit “It’s your time and her money – rots a ruck”.
This is a similar situation – threatened legal activity without a basis to POSSIBLY win (truth is truth and CAN NEVER BE LIBELOUS)
K&B lawyers must be real clowns. Two Points:
1. The wrong they meant to refer to is “tortious interference” not “tortuous interference”.
2. In the original post all the unfavorable comments (as opposed to recitations of the events of the interview) were stated as opinions of the writer – not as statements of fact. Libel does not sound for statements of opinion.
Of course the person who wrote that letter (not necessarily the same as the person who signed it) may be some muck-a-muck’s idiot nephew whom they had to hire for internal political reasons and who got fobbed off on the dunning letters department. (Note to K&B: libel does not sound for statements of possibility either).
[…] It’s Always Funny… …how companies these days fail to understand exactly what the Internet can do to make or break them. I have in mind a recent example of a recruiting company (headhunters by the name of J.L. Kirk and Associates) that is trying to silence a blogger who wrote a public complaint about what she perceived to be their high-pressure sales tactics, and the fact that they wanted more than $4000 to place her husband in a job. The company’s silencing tactic includes a takedown demand from the law firm King and Ballow. […]
[…] & Associates has a reputation for using less then honest business practices thanks to their certified cease and desist letter to Katherine Coble from the law firm of King & […]
In their letter the crucial word is MALICIOUS, meaning a malcious intent to damage. There was no malicious intent visible. You need to read your whole blog to arrive at this conclusion and for whats its worth your blog is transparently honest. Just think of all the crusading journalists who have said much worse and never been sued.
The high upfront fees and the ‘bring your partner with you pitch’ looks bad on them – but its not illegal. In sales slang this 2 person, Mr Mrs interview pitch is called a ‘double legger sales pitch’. The reason they want you both there is to head off any clients sales resistance excuse/s that go; ‘That you need to speak to your partner about it – before saying yes and entering into a contract with them’. Which is the number one excuse given – to sales reps. Free speech and fair comment rules apply here.
Kath, I have copied and pasted this from Writers Weekly:
Tortuous Interference
Tortuous interference is the unlawful interference into one’s contractual or business affairs. For example, someone who uses the web to defame an individual’s business and contacts their customers (or prospective customers) may be violating this law. A special case of tortuous interference called “Tortuous Interference with Prospective Advantage” is available in some states to punish those who seek to damage one’s ability to find and retain new customers.
The elements of the tort of interference with contract are:
A valid contract between the plaintiff and a third person that confers upon plaintiff a contractual right against a third person.
The defendant knows of the contract. The defendant intentionally induces the third person not to perform the contract.
The defendant acts without justification. The defendant’s conduct causes actual pecuniary harm to the plaintiff.
I PREFER THE OLD ENGLISH EXPLANATION OF TORTURE-OUS INTERFERANCE TO OBTAIN A CONFESSION, IT WAS OUTLAWED. PITY.
[…] who wrote about this headhunting experience with her husband. It was that blog post that got her in trouble with the law firm King & […]
[…] Just Another Pretty Farce: “Text of King & Ballow Demand Letter” […]
[…] We here in Nashville have some experience with “Christain” businesses deciding they can …. […]
penis enlargement pill http://www.romania.org/community/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2741
Two new studies show why some people are more attractive for members of the opposite sex than others.
The University of Florida, Florida State University found that physically attractive people almost instantly attract the attention of the interlocutor, sobesednitsy with them, literally, it is difficult to make eye. This conclusion was reached by a series of psychological experiments, which were determined by the people who believe in sending the first seconds after the acquaintance. Here, a curious feature: single, unmarried experimental preferred to look at the guys, beauty opposite sex, and family, people most often by representatives of their sex.
The authors believe that this feature developed a behavior as a result of the evolution: a man trying to find a decent pair to acquire offspring. If this is resolved, he wondered potential rivals. Detailed information about this magazine will be published Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
In turn, a joint study of the Rockefeller University, Rockefeller University and Duke University, Duke University in North Carolina revealed that women are perceived differently by men smell. During experiments studied the perception of women one of the ingredients of male pheromone-androstenona smell, which is contained in urine or sweat.
The results were startling: women are part of this repugnant odor, and the other part is very attractive, resembling the smell of vanilla, and the third group have not felt any smell. The authors argue that the reason is that the differences in the receptor responsible for the olfactory system, from different people are different.
It has long been proven that mammals (including human) odor is one way of attracting the attention of representatives of the opposite sex. A detailed article about the journal Nature will publish.
Discount viagra online
viagra
http://rollyo.com/VIAGRA-LOWEST-PRICES
[url=http://rollyo.com/VIAGRA-LOWEST-PRICES]viagra[/url]
Discount viagra online
viagra
http://my.opera.com/VIAGRCHEAP/about/
[url=http://my.opera.com/VIAGRCHEAP/about/]viagra[/url]
levitra online
<a href=”http://en.allexperts.com/sitesearch.htm?terms=+ORDER+LEVITRA+LOWEST+PRICES+”>levitra
http://en.allexperts.com/sitesearch.htm?terms=+ORDER+LEVITRA+LOWEST+PRICES+
[url=http://en.allexperts.com/sitesearch.htm?terms=+ORDER+LEVITRA+LOWEST+PRICES+]levitra[/url]
generic tramadol online
generic tramadol
http://www.youtube.com/qutramadol
[url=http://www.youtube.com/qutramadol]generic tramadol[/url]
gfdbd c ttdfsc
gfdbd c ttdfsc
kiuybg vfreds
kiuybg vfreds
[…] me in Wow! The local blogosphere is ablaze today over the Coble Case, in which a local blogger had a threatening letter sent to her from a law firm whose client said blogger had criticized in a post. I’m not a trained […]
All-Round Soccer am showboat ringtone, download ringtones and wallpapers
All-Round Soccer am showboat ringtone, download ringtones and wallpapers
Hey, cool tips.
Hey, cool tips.
· By the way- Here are some links to rich and kirk leipzig
http://www.google.com/search?q=jl+kirk&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&startIndex=&startPage=1
http://www.topix.com/forum/milwaukee/THMB68HE6O1VUPCSK
Google: Transforming America, Transition America, JL Kirk, Rich Leipzig, Kirk Leipzig, Bernard Haldane-
—————————————–
Check out these google links? By the way, why does Rich’s website-Careerfocusconsultants.com not show an address for his business or a phone number? Guess he doesn’t want news channel 5 to show up unannounced (again)
http://www.google.com/search?q=rich+leipzig&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&startIndex=&startPage=1
http://www.ripoffreport.com/Employment-Services/Ed-Wozniak-Nashville/ed-wozniak-nashville-profess-5y925.htm
——————————————
http://www.newschannel5.com/Global/story.asp?
S=8651526
http://www.google.com/search?q=rich+leipzig&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&startIndex=&startPage=1
————————————————-
The Job Search Emotional Rollercoaster – Rich Leipzig
“God’s word promises us in Jer. 29:11 “I know the Plans I have for you, declares the Lord, plans to prosper you and not harm you, plans to give you a hope and future”. End of quote- I think I know the plans that God has for You!!!
————————————————————
Isn’t it odd that Careerfocusconsultants.com does not give a phone number or physical address? That’s one way to keep the news cameras at bay (for a while) Rich gives a PO box and his cell phone as contact information for his “business” at his Career focus consultants-facebook page- why is that Rich? You have a business with no phone number?
Rich Leipzig is a low-classed uneducated charlatan who
preys on the weak and vulnerable job seeker. He can’t find a real job. He professes to be a Christian and says he loves Jesus. I got news for you Rich- Jesus does not love you. You have hurt countless numbers of people. Remember the poor young couple that interviewed with You and I on the third day of my employment with you and your brother at JL Kirk? They had a heart-wrenching story about how they had just lost their son to a terrible disease. They were in agony and looking to find a new life in Nashville. All you saw was a vulnerable couple and an easy sale. I resigned the next day and swore that I would never stop exposing you and your brother and anyone else who preys on the poor and the vulnerable.
God will ultimately judge you upon your death. In the meantime, I intend to make your days on this earth as uncomfortable as possible as long as you continue this unconscionable scam and I have A LOT OF HELP !!!!!!!!!!
You are one sorry son-of-a-bitch!!! Go ahead and try to sue me for libel like you and your brother Kirk tried in 2005 and with Katherine Coble in 2007- How has that worked out for you?
Rich- do you know how many peoples’ lives you have turned upside down with your lies and deceit. I really do wish you were stupid enough to come after all of us with a lawsuit so that we could see you crumble before a jury of your peers. You can run but you can never hide.
Another bust for Rich and Ed
http://www.newschannel5.com/Global/story.asp?S=8651526
Rich, the news media has been alerted to your latest scam. How does it feel to wonder if the next “victim” that comes to see you is wired with a hidden camera and audio- you will never know it unti it makes the 5:00 news?
As long as you perpetuate this scam, there will be many people like myself who will work tirelessly to expose your scam and greed
societies president extinctions running issue impact beginning
comment57, http://www.rc.umd.edu/cstahmer/cogsci/ order viagra pro, fhbw7, http://www.rc.umd.edu/ viagra
farma the partner program. (new super) from 500-600 unique 2000$ addresses in a week.
http://signup.365pills.com/
invite
271CC0962D
4B36B70BFD
FFE48218D8
444F5F1C25
A892E0A6C6
D4F5CD3CD0
other ?! go icq 359620740
İYİ
iyi
http://i081.radikal.ru/1111/a3/35aab96395aft.jpg
Когда вы активно пользуетесь компьютером, возникают серьезные проблемы с накопившимися файлами, ярлычками и папками на рабочем столе и в других директориях. «Захламленность», безусловно, влияет на скорость обнаружения того или иного файла или документа. Мультибар наведет идеальный порядок на вашем компьютере, систематизировав имеющиеся данные. Быстрый доступ к файлам и папкам, запуск приложений в 1 клик, прогноз погоды – это лишь малая часть возможностей программы. Кроме того, возможности мультибара могут быть расширены за счет дополнений! Интерфейс Мультибара удобен и красив, а управиться с программой сможет даже ребенок.
Мультибар позволяет контролировать практически все этапы работы на компьютере, а также оперативно находить необходимую вам информацию на компьютере или в интернете. Скачайте программу «Мультибар» и убедитесь, что теперь вместе с вами работает настоящий помощник, с которым любое дело будет по плечу.
Скачать Мультибар
Это не вирус и не чего такого, отличная программа, сам пользуюсь, вот думаю может еще кому пригодится, да и скорость закачки там как на торрентах при хорошей раздаче.
Уважаемый Модераторы и Администраторы, если противоречит правилам то прошу меня извинить, просто хотел поделится с людьми.
Thanks for finally writing about >Text Of King & Ballow Demand Letter Just Another Pretty Farce <Loved it!
Typically, these bombs are made by placing TNT or other explosives in a Pressure Cooker being pressure steamed.
A Pressure Cooker IS NOT a pressure fryer?
Seal lid and bring to a boil. S were” not good at all,” and said
the document had been locked in a box that only he, his wife
and three children have access to in his home, according to the complaint.
When I originally commented I clicked the “Notify me when new comments are added” checkbox and now each time a comment is
added I get three e-mails with the same comment. Is
there any way you can remove people from that service?
Appreciate it!
Hi, the whole thing is going fine here and ofcourse every one is sharing
data, that’s actually good, keep up writing.
acheter finasteride en ligne
finasteride acheter
acheter finasteride en ligne
finasteride acheter en ligne
acheter clomid en ligne
clomid acheter sur internet
acheter clomid
ou acheter clomid sur internet
female viagra approved
new female viagra
new female viagra
female verion of viagra
viagra coupon printable
viagra coupon participating pharmacies
viagra coupon
viagra coupon for 3 free pills